Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Ancient MesoAmerica News Updates - Opening Banner
Ancient MesoAmerica News Updates 2009, No. 8: London, England - More Information on the Upcoming Exhibition "Moctezuma" at The British Museum
Today, Tuesday April 7, 2009, the online edition of the daily British newspaper The Telegraph posted an extensive note on the upcoming exhibition entitled "Moctezuma: Aztec Ruler" at The British Museum. The exhibition will be shown at the museum from September 25, 2009, to January 24, 2010. It will feature an alternative rendering of the final moments in the life of Moctezuma, supported by two small images from 16th century manuscripts: He was killed by the Spaniards, not his own people (edited by AMaNU) (photo: The Telegraph/AP: Aztec mosaic mask, probably a potrait of Xiuhtecuhtli):
Moctezuma, last Aztec ruler 'was no traitor', British Museum exhibition to claim - Moctezuma, the last ruler of the Aztec empire, was not a traitor who sold out to the Spanish conquistadors, a new British Museum exhibition will claim later this year. To date, history has cast him as the man who ceded his empire to the Spanish in 1520 largely without a fight. However, evidence never before presented in public in Britain will show that he was humiliated before his people by being paraded in chains, supporting an alternative theory that power was wrested from his grasp.
Two portraits from the 1560s will show that he was bound in chains and rope before being paraded on a balcony. Colin McEwan, curator at the British Museum, said it was likely that the conventional picture of Moctezuma as a willing agent of colonial rule had been painted by the Spanish victors.
He thought the version of events indicated by the 1560s manuscripts – which were produced by indigenous scribes under Spanish patronage – was "probably closer to what actually happened".
He argued: "Is it likely that a feared military ruler just completely changes his complexion and weakly and willingly subjects himself to ceding his empire to the Spanish? Is that plausible?"
Moctezuma came to power in 1502, ruling over one of the day's largest and most advanced civilisations, which straddled much of Central America from the Caribbean to the Pacific. While the Aztec empire was at its zenith, its politics were fragile. Moctezuma consolidated power by heavily taxing his subjects, in the form of raw materials or precious art works. One such object is thought to be the turquoise, gold foil and mother of pearl mask that will go on display in the exhibition.
Consequently the Spanish found it easy to find high-powered enemies of the emperor among his ranks, said Neil MacGregor, director of the British Museum. He said: "What is so interesting is that this is an empire that is at the top of its form when it falls. The way it was constructed made it vulnerable because it made it easy for the Spanish to recruit disaffected allies." Ironically, the lasting picture of Moctezuma as a turncoat meant he has become more celebrated more in Europe than in Mexico, noted Mr McEwan.
Moctezuma: Aztec Ruler, which opens in September, is the fourth and last exhibition in a British Museum series about great historical rulers. It began two years ago with The First Emperor, which brought a small selection of China's Terracotta Army to London. That coup earned the museum 850,000 visitors over seven months. Last summer Hadrian: Empire and Conflict attracted 244,000 over three months while 50,000 have seen the third, about the Iranian ruler Shah Abbas, since it opened in February (written by Stephen Adams; source Telegraph).
The British Museum now has a special website on which further information, relevant to the exhibition, can be found: Moctezuma: Aztec Ruler. It features, for instance, a link to the full press release.
Another British newspaper, The Guardian, provided the following online report on the upcoming exhibition (edited by AMaNU) (photo: The Guardian/Museo de America, Madrid: Detail from Enconchado 16, by Juan y Miguel Gonzalez, A.D. 1698, Moctezuma shown on the balcony):

New exhibition challenges view of Aztec emperor Moctezuma as traitor - Contrary to popular belief, the Aztec emperor Moctezuma was murdered by his Spanish captors and not by his own people, the British Museum will argue in a new exhibition that will try to rehabilitate the emperor's image as a traitor.
The exhibition will bring together spectacular loans from Europe, where the Spanish conquistadors brought many of the Aztecs' greatest treasures, and from Mexico, where recently excavated relics from the lost civilisation continue to be found under its modern capital, Mexico City. Scientific tests on objects including a spectacular turquoise mask, from the British Museum's own collection, show that in a single piece, the gold, precious stone and feather decorations were drawn from many different places. "What we are trying to do is look at an absolutely key moment in the history of the world through the filter of one man," museum director Neil MacGregor said. "There has never been an exhibition on this man, a great emperor of an extremely sophisticated empire in ways which seemed very strange to European eyes."
The traditional account of the death of Moctezuma – the museum has adopted the spelling as closer to his name in his own Nahuatl language than the more common Montezuma – is that having been taken a willing hostage by Hernán Cortés and the conquistadors, he was killed by his own outraged people.
According to several versions of the story, in 1520, the Spanish brought him out onto a balcony of his own palace to try and calm the riotous mob, but he was pelted with stones and killed. One Spanish account, written years later, even insists that he refused medical help and food from his Spanish captors, who "spoke very kindly to him", before suddenly dying.
However, the exhibition will include two small images from later manuscripts, one now in Glasgow, one in Mexico, both probably made by Aztecs working for Spanish patrons, which show the leader distinctly less kindly treated, brought out with a rope around his neck, or shackled. Once the Aztecs began to revolt against the presence of the Spanish in their capital city, Tenochtitlan, this version suggests, Moctezuma was useless to them, so they killed him before just managing to escape with their lives.
"Moctezuma is the last in our series on great rulers and their legacies and presents perhaps one of the most fascinating examples of implosion of power and the clash of civilisations," MacGregor said. The series included China's first emperor, Qin, the Roman emperor Hadrian, the wall builder, and the 16th-century Iranian ruler Shah Abbas. While there were writings by, and many contemporary accounts of, the characters, curator Colin McEwan admitted that authentic personal details about Moctezuma are so scarce that one academic he consulted said he thought the exhibition would be impossible.
"We will raise many questions but we may not succeed in answering them all," Mc­Ewan said. The exhibition, with a related show of 20th-century revolutionary posters and images opening in October, with both running into next year, will mark both the bicentenary of Mexico's declaration of independence from Spain in 1810, and of the Mexican Revolution 100 years later (written by Maev Kennedy; source The Guardian).

2 Comments:

Blogger Cacalotl said...

Eric, you're wrong when you say that Montezuma was the last aztec ruler. The last one was Cuauhtemoc. Between them, you forgot to mention Cuitlahuac who died of a disease brought by the Spaniards...

April 30, 2009 at 5:26 PM  
Blogger ahximbalmaya said...

Well, I did not write that Moctezuma was the last Aztec (Mexica) ruler, it was the correspondent of The Telegraph. This AMaNU facilitated two British newspaper reports on the upcoming exhition at The British Museum. In my editing efforts, I do not correct this kind of "mistake." And only if time permits, I add additional notes as an addendum: ... Moctezuma (Motecuhzoma Xocoyotl/Xocoyotzin), AD 1502-1520; Cuitlahuac, AD 1520 (ruled for 80 days, died of smallpox); Cuauhtemoc, AD 1520-1525. It has to be noted that the Cronica X sources (Duran, manuscrito Tovar, Codex Ramirez) do not illustrate the rulers after Moctezuma. In Sahagun (Codices Matritenses), the two rulers after Moctezuma are illustrated.

May 6, 2009 at 12:01 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home